<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 289 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80223</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the entitlement of the first respondent to reimbursement under the International Price Reimbursement Scheme (IPRS), 1981. It held that the appellants were authorities under Article 12 of the Constitution and subject to writ jurisdiction. The court dismissed the writ appeals, awarded costs, and ordered the release of the bank guarantee provided during the interim period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 289 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80223</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the entitlement of the first respondent to reimbursement under the International Price Reimbursement Scheme (IPRS), 1981. It held that the appellants were authorities under Article 12 of the Constitution and subject to writ jurisdiction. The court dismissed the writ appeals, awarded costs, and ordered the release of the bank guarantee provided during the interim period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>