<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 297 - COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS), NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80222</link>
    <description>Customs confiscation and personal penalty were held unsustainable where the factual record showed the VCR and cassette had been imported by a third party as baggage, duty had been paid, and the subsequent gift transaction was corroborated by customs investigation. On those facts, liability to confiscation was not established, so the impugned customs order could not stand. The confiscation and penalty were therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:14:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 297 - COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS), NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80222</link>
      <description>Customs confiscation and personal penalty were held unsustainable where the factual record showed the VCR and cassette had been imported by a third party as baggage, duty had been paid, and the subsequent gift transaction was corroborated by customs investigation. On those facts, liability to confiscation was not established, so the impugned customs order could not stand. The confiscation and penalty were therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>