<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (5) TMI 290 - COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS), NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80217</link>
    <description>The Collector of Customs (Appeals) in New Delhi allowed depreciation beyond the fourth year for the valuation of a second-hand car for customs purposes. The appellant&#039;s argument that depreciation should be considered beyond the fourth year was accepted, leading to the establishment of a specific depreciation rate for each subsequent year. The Collector determined a depreciation modality of 4% for the fifth year, 3% for the sixth year, and 2% for each successive year thereafter. As a result, the original assessment order was set aside, and a reassessment was directed based on the new depreciation formula, providing relief to the appellant in the customs valuation of the car.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:05:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (5) TMI 290 - COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS), NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80217</link>
      <description>The Collector of Customs (Appeals) in New Delhi allowed depreciation beyond the fourth year for the valuation of a second-hand car for customs purposes. The appellant&#039;s argument that depreciation should be considered beyond the fourth year was accepted, leading to the establishment of a specific depreciation rate for each subsequent year. The Collector determined a depreciation modality of 4% for the fifth year, 3% for the sixth year, and 2% for each successive year thereafter. As a result, the original assessment order was set aside, and a reassessment was directed based on the new depreciation formula, providing relief to the appellant in the customs valuation of the car.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>