<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (2) TMI 385 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80215</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, ruled in favor of the Kerala State Electricity Board in a case concerning excise duty liability on poles manufactured by contractors. The Tribunal determined that the contractors, not the Board, were the actual manufacturers of the poles based on contractual terms and agreements. As a result, the demand for excise duty from the Board was deemed unjustified. The appeal was allowed, the Collector&#039;s order was set aside, and any necessary consequential relief was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:02:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (2) TMI 385 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80215</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, ruled in favor of the Kerala State Electricity Board in a case concerning excise duty liability on poles manufactured by contractors. The Tribunal determined that the contractors, not the Board, were the actual manufacturers of the poles based on contractual terms and agreements. As a result, the demand for excise duty from the Board was deemed unjustified. The appeal was allowed, the Collector&#039;s order was set aside, and any necessary consequential relief was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>