<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (1) TMI 243 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80214</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside both demands for duty. It emphasized the necessity of proper procedures such as show cause notices and personal hearings in excise duty matters. The reclassification of MW I wire without a show cause notice was deemed ineffective, and demands for duty prior to the notice date were held unenforceable. The Tribunal distinguished the case from previous precedents based on the functional utility of the wire in welding processes, leaving the classification issue unresolved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:53:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (1) TMI 243 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80214</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside both demands for duty. It emphasized the necessity of proper procedures such as show cause notices and personal hearings in excise duty matters. The reclassification of MW I wire without a show cause notice was deemed ineffective, and demands for duty prior to the notice date were held unenforceable. The Tribunal distinguished the case from previous precedents based on the functional utility of the wire in welding processes, leaving the classification issue unresolved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>