https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80154 An applicant satisfied proviso (f) to Rule 2(f) of the Gold Control (Licensing of Dealers) Rules by applying within 60 days of leaving employment and showing more than five years' experience with licensed dealers; continuous service with one dealer was not required. Turnover figures of existing licensed dealers, standing alone, were insufficient to justify refusal of a fresh gold dealers licence, especially where the figures were inconsistent and no minimum turnover threshold had been prescribed. Officers exercising delegated powers under Section 27 of the Gold Control Act could not refuse a licence on public interest grounds without a direction from the Central Government under Section 27(6A). The rejection of the licence application was therefore set aside. en-us Thu, 29 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:15:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80154 An applicant satisfied proviso (f) to Rule 2(f) of the Gold Control (Licensing of Dealers) Rules by applying within 60 days of leaving employment and showing more than five years' experience with licensed dealers; continuous service with one dealer was not required. Turnover figures of existing licensed dealers, standing alone, were insufficient to justify refusal of a fresh gold dealers licence, especially where the figures were inconsistent and no minimum turnover threshold had been prescribed. Officers exercising delegated powers under Section 27 of the Gold Control Act could not refuse a licence on public interest grounds without a direction from the Central Government under Section 27(6A). The rejection of the licence application was therefore set aside. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 29 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80154