<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (12) TMI 277 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80152</link>
    <description>A firm&#039;s gold dealer licence under Section 52 of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 does not become automatically invalid merely because the partnership changes; the change may be approved by the Administrator without any requirement that approval must precede the change itself. The provision also does not require a fresh licence application in the new partnership&#039;s name before approval of the constitution change can be considered. Section 103 was treated as inapplicable because it concerns succession by death, not a voluntary change in partnership. Where the department was informed of the change and no disqualification of the incoming partner was found, rejection on a mere technicality was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:10:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (12) TMI 277 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80152</link>
      <description>A firm&#039;s gold dealer licence under Section 52 of the Gold (Control) Act, 1968 does not become automatically invalid merely because the partnership changes; the change may be approved by the Administrator without any requirement that approval must precede the change itself. The provision also does not require a fresh licence application in the new partnership&#039;s name before approval of the constitution change can be considered. Section 103 was treated as inapplicable because it concerns succession by death, not a voluntary change in partnership. Where the department was informed of the change and no disqualification of the incoming partner was found, rejection on a mere technicality was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>