https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80116 Disclosure of material facts to the department, a departmental reply that steam use in heating the solution was not objectionable, filing of the classification list claiming exemption, and clearance of goods in accordance with departmental approval meant the removals could not be treated as warranting penal consequences. On those undisputed facts, confiscation and penalty were not sustainable. The challenge to the appellate order therefore failed, as the facts did not justify treating the clearances as an offence attracting confiscation or penalty. en-us Mon, 18 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:29:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80116 Disclosure of material facts to the department, a departmental reply that steam use in heating the solution was not objectionable, filing of the classification list claiming exemption, and clearance of goods in accordance with departmental approval meant the removals could not be treated as warranting penal consequences. On those undisputed facts, confiscation and penalty were not sustainable. The challenge to the appellate order therefore failed, as the facts did not justify treating the clearances as an offence attracting confiscation or penalty. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 18 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80116