<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (11) TMI 134 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80096</link>
    <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57G could not be denied merely because gate passes accompanying inputs bore more than two endorsements before receipt by the claimant factory. The procedural relaxation for endorsed gate passes was intended to facilitate credit where the duty-paid nature of the goods and duty quantum could be verified. Denial on the sole ground of excessive endorsements was a mechanical approach inconsistent with the Modvat scheme. Credit remained subject to verification that the gate passes were genuine and had not been used earlier for availing credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:02:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (11) TMI 134 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80096</link>
      <description>Modvat credit under Rule 57G could not be denied merely because gate passes accompanying inputs bore more than two endorsements before receipt by the claimant factory. The procedural relaxation for endorsed gate passes was intended to facilitate credit where the duty-paid nature of the goods and duty quantum could be verified. Denial on the sole ground of excessive endorsements was a mechanical approach inconsistent with the Modvat scheme. Credit remained subject to verification that the gate passes were genuine and had not been used earlier for availing credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>