<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 236 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80087</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on inputs does not, by itself, reduce the assessable value of excisable goods; valuation remains governed by Section 4 on the basis of the normal price, while input credit only affects the duty payable on final products. A genuine reduction in price can matter only through the prescribed price-list procedure. A revised contract price could not be accepted on the existing record because the original contracts and the manner of revision were not examined, and the effect of the amendment, including any retrospective operation, required fresh factual verification under Rule 173C. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:29:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 236 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80087</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on inputs does not, by itself, reduce the assessable value of excisable goods; valuation remains governed by Section 4 on the basis of the normal price, while input credit only affects the duty payable on final products. A genuine reduction in price can matter only through the prescribed price-list procedure. A revised contract price could not be accepted on the existing record because the original contracts and the manner of revision were not examined, and the effect of the amendment, including any retrospective operation, required fresh factual verification under Rule 173C. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>