<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (9) TMI 225 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80076</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, considered an appeal by M/s. Eastern Coils Pvt. Ltd. against the Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta&#039;s order. The appellant sought a stay on duty and penalty amounts due to financial hardship. The Tribunal set a pre-deposit condition of Rs. 10,00,000 to be paid in five monthly installments, considering the lack of evidence of marketability of repaired goods. The limitation period for duty demand was restricted to six months, and the respondent opposed the stay application. The Tribunal directed compliance with the payment schedule and imposed restrictions on alienating fixed assets during the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:22:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (9) TMI 225 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80076</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi, considered an appeal by M/s. Eastern Coils Pvt. Ltd. against the Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta&#039;s order. The appellant sought a stay on duty and penalty amounts due to financial hardship. The Tribunal set a pre-deposit condition of Rs. 10,00,000 to be paid in five monthly installments, considering the lack of evidence of marketability of repaired goods. The limitation period for duty demand was restricted to six months, and the respondent opposed the stay application. The Tribunal directed compliance with the payment schedule and imposed restrictions on alienating fixed assets during the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>