<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (8) TMI 210 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80069</link>
    <description>For goods cleared under Rule 196A, excise assessable value was to be based on the value declared by the manufacturer, not on the higher price later realised by the assessee on resale after removal. The Tribunal applied the settled principle that the declared manufacturer&#039;s value governed assessment in such transactions and rejected the subsequent sale price as the valuation basis. The assessee therefore obtained relief on valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:42:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (8) TMI 210 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80069</link>
      <description>For goods cleared under Rule 196A, excise assessable value was to be based on the value declared by the manufacturer, not on the higher price later realised by the assessee on resale after removal. The Tribunal applied the settled principle that the declared manufacturer&#039;s value governed assessment in such transactions and rejected the subsequent sale price as the valuation basis. The assessee therefore obtained relief on valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>