<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 257 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80055</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Collector&#039;s order that PF moulding powder was chargeable to duty under Item 15A(1) of the CET. The Tribunal upheld the penalty and confiscation imposed, stating that the conversion of PF resin into moulding powder constituted &quot;manufacture&quot; and the goods were correctly classified under Item 15A(1), making them liable for excise duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:27:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 257 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80055</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Collector&#039;s order that PF moulding powder was chargeable to duty under Item 15A(1) of the CET. The Tribunal upheld the penalty and confiscation imposed, stating that the conversion of PF resin into moulding powder constituted &quot;manufacture&quot; and the goods were correctly classified under Item 15A(1), making them liable for excise duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>