https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80051 The High Court declined to adjudicate the disputed legality of the seizure of National Savings Certificates, fixed deposit receipts and cash in writ proceedings, and instead left those questions to be determined in the pending criminal complaint. Exercising supervisory jurisdiction, it issued a mandamus directing the Special Judicial Magistrate (Economic Offences) to decide the complaint within three months of filing a certified copy of the judgment. The court's approach reflects judicial restraint in writ jurisdiction where collateral factual and legal controversies are better resolved by the criminal forum. en-us Mon, 24 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:17:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80051 The High Court declined to adjudicate the disputed legality of the seizure of National Savings Certificates, fixed deposit receipts and cash in writ proceedings, and instead left those questions to be determined in the pending criminal complaint. Exercising supervisory jurisdiction, it issued a mandamus directing the Special Judicial Magistrate (Economic Offences) to decide the complaint within three months of filing a certified copy of the judgment. The court's approach reflects judicial restraint in writ jurisdiction where collateral factual and legal controversies are better resolved by the criminal forum. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80051