<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (6) TMI 205 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80038</link>
    <description>Insoluble sulphur with 20% oil content was classified under heading 25.01/32(10) of the Customs Tariff Act rather than heading 38.01/19(7), because the Tribunal followed its earlier decision on the same classification question and found no reason to depart from it. The consistent application of that prior view determined the classification, and the appellants obtained consequential relief on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:42:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (6) TMI 205 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80038</link>
      <description>Insoluble sulphur with 20% oil content was classified under heading 25.01/32(10) of the Customs Tariff Act rather than heading 38.01/19(7), because the Tribunal followed its earlier decision on the same classification question and found no reason to depart from it. The consistent application of that prior view determined the classification, and the appellants obtained consequential relief on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>