<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (5) TMI 218 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80029</link>
    <description>The appellant was recognized as the legal representative of a deceased individual for pursuing an appeal. Preventive Officers seized foreign goods from the deceased&#039;s premises, alleging a breach of Customs Act provisions. VCRs and video cassettes were confiscated with a penalty imposed. The appellant argued for the legality of acquisition and importation of goods. The Tribunal upheld VCR confiscation but allowed release upon payment, considering legal procurement. Video cassettes were confiscated due to lack of proof of legal importation, with the penalty reduced. The decision encompassed legal representation, seizure, confiscation, arguments, contravention allegations, evidence assessment, and penalty outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:05:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (5) TMI 218 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80029</link>
      <description>The appellant was recognized as the legal representative of a deceased individual for pursuing an appeal. Preventive Officers seized foreign goods from the deceased&#039;s premises, alleging a breach of Customs Act provisions. VCRs and video cassettes were confiscated with a penalty imposed. The appellant argued for the legality of acquisition and importation of goods. The Tribunal upheld VCR confiscation but allowed release upon payment, considering legal procurement. Video cassettes were confiscated due to lack of proof of legal importation, with the penalty reduced. The decision encompassed legal representation, seizure, confiscation, arguments, contravention allegations, evidence assessment, and penalty outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>