<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 291 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80021</link>
    <description>Licensing provisions that direct the authority to have regard to specified factors require collective consideration of all relevant circumstances, but they do not necessarily make every factor an absolute precondition for refusal. On that approach, Rule 2 of the Gold Control (Licensing of Dealers) Rules was treated as conferring discretion rather than imposing a rigid checklist. The commentary also notes that experience need not mean continuous service with a single employer where the text does not say so, and turnover should be assessed as a practical guiding factor. On those grounds, the grant of a gold dealer&#039;s licence was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:45:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 291 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80021</link>
      <description>Licensing provisions that direct the authority to have regard to specified factors require collective consideration of all relevant circumstances, but they do not necessarily make every factor an absolute precondition for refusal. On that approach, Rule 2 of the Gold Control (Licensing of Dealers) Rules was treated as conferring discretion rather than imposing a rigid checklist. The commentary also notes that experience need not mean continuous service with a single employer where the text does not say so, and turnover should be assessed as a practical guiding factor. On those grounds, the grant of a gold dealer&#039;s licence was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>