https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80002 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, overturning penalty imposition and goods confiscation. The demand for differential duty was deemed unjustified due to fabric composition discrepancies and the Department's failure to provide crucial evidence, breaching natural justice principles. The tribunal considered allowances for fabric composition determination, leading to the decision to set aside the penalty and confiscation. The appellants were granted consequential relief, with lower authorities' decisions reversed in their favor. en-us Tue, 30 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:41:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80002 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, overturning penalty imposition and goods confiscation. The demand for differential duty was deemed unjustified due to fabric composition discrepancies and the Department's failure to provide crucial evidence, breaching natural justice principles. The tribunal considered allowances for fabric composition determination, leading to the decision to set aside the penalty and confiscation. The appellants were granted consequential relief, with lower authorities' decisions reversed in their favor. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 30 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=80002