<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 72 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79049</link>
    <description>The High Court of Delhi dismissed an appeal challenging an order by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the Assessment Year 1997-1998. The court emphasized that the burden of proof to establish under-statement or concealment of income rests with the revenue, and the opinion of the DVO must not be accepted without the rejection of books of account. Consequently, the appeal was rejected based on this legal principle.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:36:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 72 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79049</link>
      <description>The High Court of Delhi dismissed an appeal challenging an order by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the Assessment Year 1997-1998. The court emphasized that the burden of proof to establish under-statement or concealment of income rests with the revenue, and the opinion of the DVO must not be accepted without the rejection of books of account. Consequently, the appeal was rejected based on this legal principle.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>