<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 266 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79041</link>
    <description>The appellants accepted liability for service tax as Cable Operator Service but contested penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The penalty under section 76 was set aside, but the penalty under section 78 was upheld due to the assessees&#039; failure to pay service tax on their total turnover.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 15:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 266 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79041</link>
      <description>The appellants accepted liability for service tax as Cable Operator Service but contested penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The penalty under section 76 was set aside, but the penalty under section 78 was upheld due to the assessees&#039; failure to pay service tax on their total turnover.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>