https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79034 The impugned order confirming a demand under the Central Excise Act was set aside due to the failure to consider undue hardship for deposit exemption. The matter was remanded for the lower appellate authority to address the limitation issue and dispose of the appeal within a specified time frame, considering both party hardship and revenue interests. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to expedite the appeal process within thirty days of the party's appearance, emphasizing the need for a detailed examination of facts and a speaking order on deposit exemption. en-us Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 May 2013 15:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79034 The impugned order confirming a demand under the Central Excise Act was set aside due to the failure to consider undue hardship for deposit exemption. The matter was remanded for the lower appellate authority to address the limitation issue and dispose of the appeal within a specified time frame, considering both party hardship and revenue interests. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to expedite the appeal process within thirty days of the party's appearance, emphasizing the need for a detailed examination of facts and a speaking order on deposit exemption. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79034