<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 366 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79033</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the petitioner&#039;s application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal. The Tribunal found the reasons provided by the petitioner, including health issues and financial difficulties, insufficient to justify the nearly two-year delay. The Court emphasized that condonation of delay requires a satisfactory explanation and cannot solely rely on liability imposed by the Commissioner. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing the importance of promptly addressing obstacles to filing appeals within prescribed timelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 366 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79033</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the petitioner&#039;s application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal. The Tribunal found the reasons provided by the petitioner, including health issues and financial difficulties, insufficient to justify the nearly two-year delay. The Court emphasized that condonation of delay requires a satisfactory explanation and cannot solely rely on liability imposed by the Commissioner. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing the importance of promptly addressing obstacles to filing appeals within prescribed timelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>