<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 206 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79026</link>
    <description>Service of reassessment notice under Section 148 was treated as a question of fact, not a substantial question of law. The Tribunal found that the notices were served on 31.03.2003 and that the reassessment orders were time-barred. The High Court held that no illegality was shown in that finding and that the appeal did not raise any substantial question of law for consideration. The appeal was therefore dismissed for lack of merit, with the Revenue succeeding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 23:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 206 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79026</link>
      <description>Service of reassessment notice under Section 148 was treated as a question of fact, not a substantial question of law. The Tribunal found that the notices were served on 31.03.2003 and that the reassessment orders were time-barred. The High Court held that no illegality was shown in that finding and that the appeal did not raise any substantial question of law for consideration. The appeal was therefore dismissed for lack of merit, with the Revenue succeeding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>