<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 162 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79024</link>
    <description>The Allahabad High Court upheld the dismissal of a Central Excise Reference Application due to want of prosecution. The restoration application, filed after a delay of 5 1/2 years, lacked sufficient reasons for the delay. The court noted the absence of explanations for the delay and the Standing Counsel&#039;s non-appearance. Additionally, the Tribunal&#039;s findings on clandestine removal of goods lacked substantial evidence. Consequently, the High Court rejected the restoration application, affirming the initial dismissal of the Central Excise Reference Application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 23:19:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 162 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79024</link>
      <description>The Allahabad High Court upheld the dismissal of a Central Excise Reference Application due to want of prosecution. The restoration application, filed after a delay of 5 1/2 years, lacked sufficient reasons for the delay. The court noted the absence of explanations for the delay and the Standing Counsel&#039;s non-appearance. Additionally, the Tribunal&#039;s findings on clandestine removal of goods lacked substantial evidence. Consequently, the High Court rejected the restoration application, affirming the initial dismissal of the Central Excise Reference Application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>