<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 552 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79009</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty for mis-declaration of imported goods&#039; value but set aside the confiscation of machinery and redemption fine as the goods were unconditionally cleared. The appeal challenged the original authority and Commissioner (Appeals) decisions, resulting in the Tribunal partially allowing the appeal. This case emphasizes the significance of accurately declaring imported goods&#039; value to avoid penalties and confiscation under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 15:22:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 552 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79009</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty for mis-declaration of imported goods&#039; value but set aside the confiscation of machinery and redemption fine as the goods were unconditionally cleared. The appeal challenged the original authority and Commissioner (Appeals) decisions, resulting in the Tribunal partially allowing the appeal. This case emphasizes the significance of accurately declaring imported goods&#039; value to avoid penalties and confiscation under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>