<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 196 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79001</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay petition, set aside the impugned order, and remanded the case to the Commissioner for a fresh decision post the appellate proceedings outcome. The judgment underscores the importance of fulfilling export obligations for EOUs and the value of appellate proceedings in challenging decisions based on such obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 22:51:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 196 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79001</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay petition, set aside the impugned order, and remanded the case to the Commissioner for a fresh decision post the appellate proceedings outcome. The judgment underscores the importance of fulfilling export obligations for EOUs and the value of appellate proceedings in challenging decisions based on such obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=79001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>