<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 370 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78993</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting the stay application due to the untimely issuance of the show cause notice by the revisional authority and the conflicting exercise of jurisdiction. The Tribunal found the revisional order unsustainable, following the precedent set by the High Court of Rajasthan, emphasizing the significance of proper consideration and timing in revision proceedings to uphold the integrity of the legal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 13:12:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 370 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78993</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting the stay application due to the untimely issuance of the show cause notice by the revisional authority and the conflicting exercise of jurisdiction. The Tribunal found the revisional order unsustainable, following the precedent set by the High Court of Rajasthan, emphasizing the significance of proper consideration and timing in revision proceedings to uphold the integrity of the legal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>