<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 667 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78988</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s application for rectification of mistake concerning Final Order Nos. 810 &amp;amp; 811/09. The appellant&#039;s arguments challenging various aspects of the final order, including the limitation issue, were deemed impermissible attempts to re-argue the case. The Tribunal highlighted the pattern of clandestine removal of goods, rendering the limitation question irrelevant in such cases. Consequently, the Tribunal found no apparent mistake in the final order and dismissed the rectification application on 31-3-2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 12:54:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 667 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78988</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s application for rectification of mistake concerning Final Order Nos. 810 &amp;amp; 811/09. The appellant&#039;s arguments challenging various aspects of the final order, including the limitation issue, were deemed impermissible attempts to re-argue the case. The Tribunal highlighted the pattern of clandestine removal of goods, rendering the limitation question irrelevant in such cases. Consequently, the Tribunal found no apparent mistake in the final order and dismissed the rectification application on 31-3-2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>