<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 588 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78986</link>
    <description>Tariff classification of brass pellets depended on their actual composition and technical characteristics, not on dictionary meanings alone. The Tribunal noted that Chapter 74 covered copper and copper-zinc base alloy articles, while the competing classification required proper technical verification of the goods. Because no technical test had been conducted, the classification could not be determined conclusively on the existing record, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication on the basis of test results and HSN principles. The plea on limitation was left open for the adjudicating authority to consider.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 12:51:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 588 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78986</link>
      <description>Tariff classification of brass pellets depended on their actual composition and technical characteristics, not on dictionary meanings alone. The Tribunal noted that Chapter 74 covered copper and copper-zinc base alloy articles, while the competing classification required proper technical verification of the goods. Because no technical test had been conducted, the classification could not be determined conclusively on the existing record, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication on the basis of test results and HSN principles. The plea on limitation was left open for the adjudicating authority to consider.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>