<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 182 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78973</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the decision to delete the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2004-05. The appeal challenging the deletion of Rs.17,50,000 made under Section 68 was dismissed for lacking merit. The Court emphasized the importance of the assessee proving the identity of shareholders and clarified that share application money from alleged bogus shareholders cannot be treated as undisclosed income of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 23:06:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 182 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78973</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the decision to delete the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2004-05. The appeal challenging the deletion of Rs.17,50,000 made under Section 68 was dismissed for lacking merit. The Court emphasized the importance of the assessee proving the identity of shareholders and clarified that share application money from alleged bogus shareholders cannot be treated as undisclosed income of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>