<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 584 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78968</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking a writ of mandamus and prohibition related to the delivery of goods. It upheld the Customs Department&#039;s decision allowing the original importer to claim the goods, citing higher revenue and compliance. The court imposed costs on the original importer for not participating in the auction, causing hardship to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 13:46:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 584 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78968</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking a writ of mandamus and prohibition related to the delivery of goods. It upheld the Customs Department&#039;s decision allowing the original importer to claim the goods, citing higher revenue and compliance. The court imposed costs on the original importer for not participating in the auction, causing hardship to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>