<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 546 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78964</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of a redemption fine of 31% of the value of the imported photocopiers and a penalty of 10% of the value. The decision aimed to prevent importers from benefiting from illegal imports, citing legal precedents. The appeal for reduction was rejected, emphasizing the importance of upholding the law and preventing unjust enrichment from unlawful activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 12:25:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 546 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78964</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of a redemption fine of 31% of the value of the imported photocopiers and a penalty of 10% of the value. The decision aimed to prevent importers from benefiting from illegal imports, citing legal precedents. The appeal for reduction was rejected, emphasizing the importance of upholding the law and preventing unjust enrichment from unlawful activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>