<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 314 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78958</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals) for non-compliance with a stay order requiring a deposit of 50% of confirmed Service Tax. The Tribunal found the dismissal unjustified and set aside the order, remanding the matter for a decision on merit without any pre-deposit requirement. Additionally, the Tribunal addressed the tax confirmed against the appellant for freight charges, the direction to deposit the Service Tax, and the applicability of Tribunal decisions on the value under C&amp;amp;F Agent, ultimately setting aside the impugned order and remanding the case for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 314 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78958</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals) for non-compliance with a stay order requiring a deposit of 50% of confirmed Service Tax. The Tribunal found the dismissal unjustified and set aside the order, remanding the matter for a decision on merit without any pre-deposit requirement. Additionally, the Tribunal addressed the tax confirmed against the appellant for freight charges, the direction to deposit the Service Tax, and the applicability of Tribunal decisions on the value under C&amp;amp;F Agent, ultimately setting aside the impugned order and remanding the case for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>