https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78948 The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order requiring a 50% pre-deposit for hearing an appeal, citing lack of evidence and financial hardship for the goldsmith petitioner. Despite a delay, the Court intervened, directing a reduced pre-deposit of Rs. 1,00,000 within eight weeks. Failure would prompt legal action. The appeal was restored, with a three-month disposal deadline. The writ application was disposed of, emphasizing compliance with the order. The Court aimed to ensure a fair appeal hearing based on merits, addressing the petitioner's concerns effectively. en-us Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:09:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78948 The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order requiring a 50% pre-deposit for hearing an appeal, citing lack of evidence and financial hardship for the goldsmith petitioner. Despite a delay, the Court intervened, directing a reduced pre-deposit of Rs. 1,00,000 within eight weeks. Failure would prompt legal action. The appeal was restored, with a three-month disposal deadline. The writ application was disposed of, emphasizing compliance with the order. The Court aimed to ensure a fair appeal hearing based on merits, addressing the petitioner's concerns effectively. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78948