<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 663 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78946</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondent to pass a speaking order on the assessment of the imported goods for customs duty within two weeks, emphasizing the importance of providing reasons for the valuation discrepancy. The petitioner&#039;s request for a correction in the assessment and refund of excess duty paid was acknowledged, granting the petitioner the right to challenge the assessment through an appeal process. No costs were awarded in this disposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:54:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 663 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78946</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondent to pass a speaking order on the assessment of the imported goods for customs duty within two weeks, emphasizing the importance of providing reasons for the valuation discrepancy. The petitioner&#039;s request for a correction in the assessment and refund of excess duty paid was acknowledged, granting the petitioner the right to challenge the assessment through an appeal process. No costs were awarded in this disposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>