https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78943 Interim relief against an excise exemption notification could not be granted effectively without impleading the affected importers, because any restraint or condition on the notification would directly impact their rights. As the affected class was limited and identifiable, representative notice by publication under Order 1 Rule 8 CPC was directed, along with disclosure of importers who had already taken the benefit and periodic intimation of future beneficiaries. Immediate substantive interim relief was declined, but the petitioners were given liberty to renew the request after those procedural steps were completed before the Trial Judge. en-us Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:50:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78943 Interim relief against an excise exemption notification could not be granted effectively without impleading the affected importers, because any restraint or condition on the notification would directly impact their rights. As the affected class was limited and identifiable, representative notice by publication under Order 1 Rule 8 CPC was directed, along with disclosure of importers who had already taken the benefit and periodic intimation of future beneficiaries. Immediate substantive interim relief was declined, but the petitioners were given liberty to renew the request after those procedural steps were completed before the Trial Judge. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78943