<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 349 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78936</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s application for waiver of pre-deposit regarding service tax liability for business auxiliary services, including tax collection, sale of government bonds, credit cards, and mutual fund units. The Tribunal considered the commission received for tax collection and sale of government bonds, stating that these activities did not fall under &quot;Banking and Other Financial Services.&quot; The appellant&#039;s direct agreement with VISA for credit card membership also supported the argument that the commission for marketing credit cards should not be classified under business auxiliary services. Consequently, the recovery of the amounts was stayed pending appeal disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:28:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 349 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78936</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s application for waiver of pre-deposit regarding service tax liability for business auxiliary services, including tax collection, sale of government bonds, credit cards, and mutual fund units. The Tribunal considered the commission received for tax collection and sale of government bonds, stating that these activities did not fall under &quot;Banking and Other Financial Services.&quot; The appellant&#039;s direct agreement with VISA for credit card membership also supported the argument that the commission for marketing credit cards should not be classified under business auxiliary services. Consequently, the recovery of the amounts was stayed pending appeal disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>