https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78926 The HC dismissed the appeal, holding that the complaint about undervaluation of goods sold to a sister concern did not warrant intervention because any determination would not have yielded revenue to the exchequer. Since no benefit to the Revenue would accrue, the Tribunal was entitled to refrain from deciding an academic issue, and no legal infirmity was found in the impugned order. en-us Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Nov 2025 11:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78926 The HC dismissed the appeal, holding that the complaint about undervaluation of goods sold to a sister concern did not warrant intervention because any determination would not have yielded revenue to the exchequer. Since no benefit to the Revenue would accrue, the Tribunal was entitled to refrain from deciding an academic issue, and no legal infirmity was found in the impugned order. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78926