<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 154 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78910</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order for the Assessment Year 1996-97 under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was dismissed. The additions to the appellant&#039;s income were initially deleted by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) but were reinstated by the Assessing Officer under Section 68 of the Act, 1961, due to unexplained customer advances. The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision, noting the appellant&#039;s failure to provide evidence of the identity and existence of parties who advanced money, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2013 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 154 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78910</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order for the Assessment Year 1996-97 under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was dismissed. The additions to the appellant&#039;s income were initially deleted by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) but were reinstated by the Assessing Officer under Section 68 of the Act, 1961, due to unexplained customer advances. The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision, noting the appellant&#039;s failure to provide evidence of the identity and existence of parties who advanced money, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>