<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 151 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78907</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order on unexplained expenditure for construction of a farmhouse and flat. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the Tribunal correctly interpreted seized documents and found no evidence of actual expenses incurred by the assessee. The Court concluded that the Tribunal&#039;s detailed reasoning and factual findings supported the rejection of the appeal, stating that the entries in seized materials were projections, not actual expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 22:30:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 151 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78907</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order on unexplained expenditure for construction of a farmhouse and flat. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing that the Tribunal correctly interpreted seized documents and found no evidence of actual expenses incurred by the assessee. The Court concluded that the Tribunal&#039;s detailed reasoning and factual findings supported the rejection of the appeal, stating that the entries in seized materials were projections, not actual expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>