<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 555 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78906</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, ruling in favor of the respondent in a case involving liability for duty on job work. The Court found that the job work undertaken was akin to repair work, making the penalty and interest demands unjustifiable. Citing legal precedents, the Court determined that no penalty or interest should be imposed when the work is solely repair-oriented. Additionally, it was established that duty had been paid before the show cause notice was issued. Consequently, the Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, absolving the respondent from penalty and interest obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:26:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 555 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78906</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, ruling in favor of the respondent in a case involving liability for duty on job work. The Court found that the job work undertaken was akin to repair work, making the penalty and interest demands unjustifiable. Citing legal precedents, the Court determined that no penalty or interest should be imposed when the work is solely repair-oriented. Additionally, it was established that duty had been paid before the show cause notice was issued. Consequently, the Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, absolving the respondent from penalty and interest obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>