<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 142 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78901</link>
    <description>The retrospective amendment to clause (zzc) of section 65(105) widened the scope of commercial training or coaching service to include centres or institutes run as a trust, society or similar organisation, with or without profit motive. Because that amendment could affect the basis of the demand for the period July 2003 to 31 March 2007, the matter required fresh examination by the adjudicating authority. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the disputes were remitted for reconsideration after granting the assessees a reasonable opportunity of hearing. Questions such as limitation were left open for decision on remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:16:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=117001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 142 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78901</link>
      <description>The retrospective amendment to clause (zzc) of section 65(105) widened the scope of commercial training or coaching service to include centres or institutes run as a trust, society or similar organisation, with or without profit motive. Because that amendment could affect the basis of the demand for the period July 2003 to 31 March 2007, the matter required fresh examination by the adjudicating authority. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the disputes were remitted for reconsideration after granting the assessees a reasonable opportunity of hearing. Questions such as limitation were left open for decision on remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>