<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 576 - BANGALORE HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78883</link>
    <description>The revenue could not maintain an appeal against the Tribunal&#039;s dismissal of the assessee&#039;s appeal for non-prosecution because it was only the respondent before the Tribunal and was not aggrieved by any order passed against it. Since no adverse order operated against the revenue, it had no cause of action to challenge the dismissal order. The appeal was therefore held not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:31:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 576 - BANGALORE HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78883</link>
      <description>The revenue could not maintain an appeal against the Tribunal&#039;s dismissal of the assessee&#039;s appeal for non-prosecution because it was only the respondent before the Tribunal and was not aggrieved by any order passed against it. Since no adverse order operated against the revenue, it had no cause of action to challenge the dismissal order. The appeal was therefore held not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>