<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 644 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78865</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and waived the remaining predeposit of duty and penalty, permitting the appellants to reverse credit from the Cenvat Account instead of making cash or PLA deposits. The Tribunal emphasized the validity of predeposit through credit reversal, citing decisions from the Hon&#039;ble Allahabad High Court. The Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to hear the appeal on its merits after acknowledging compliance with the stay order conditions. The Tribunal set aside the previous decision and remanded the matter for further consideration, highlighting the importance of adhering to stay order requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 644 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78865</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal and waived the remaining predeposit of duty and penalty, permitting the appellants to reverse credit from the Cenvat Account instead of making cash or PLA deposits. The Tribunal emphasized the validity of predeposit through credit reversal, citing decisions from the Hon&#039;ble Allahabad High Court. The Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to hear the appeal on its merits after acknowledging compliance with the stay order conditions. The Tribunal set aside the previous decision and remanded the matter for further consideration, highlighting the importance of adhering to stay order requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>