<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 250 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78862</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, confirmed duty demand but set aside penalties. The appellants utilized credit of service tax for payment, and duty and interest were already paid. The penalty was deemed unsustainable due to a legal interpretation issue. The revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected. ()</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:04:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 250 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78862</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, confirmed duty demand but set aside penalties. The appellants utilized credit of service tax for payment, and duty and interest were already paid. The penalty was deemed unsustainable due to a legal interpretation issue. The revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected. ()</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>