<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 543 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78859</link>
    <description>Pre-deposit of the balance service tax, interest and penalties was waived where the amount already deposited was treated as sufficient for the interim requirement. The Tribunal noted that the dispute concerned classification of the service and that more than one view was possible on that question, while also taking account of the appellant&#039;s status as a Government undertaking. On that basis, further deposit was not insisted upon at the appeal stage, and recovery of the disputed dues was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:59:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 543 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78859</link>
      <description>Pre-deposit of the balance service tax, interest and penalties was waived where the amount already deposited was treated as sufficient for the interim requirement. The Tribunal noted that the dispute concerned classification of the service and that more than one view was possible on that question, while also taking account of the appellant&#039;s status as a Government undertaking. On that basis, further deposit was not insisted upon at the appeal stage, and recovery of the disputed dues was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>