<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 437 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78847</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by CASA and dismissed three appeals filed by the revenue, emphasizing that procedural conditions should not defeat the purpose of beneficial legislation. The appeal involving duty-paying documents not in the claimant&#039;s name was remanded for further verification. The judgment underscores the importance of interpreting exemption notifications in a manner that advances their intended relief and purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 18:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 437 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78847</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by CASA and dismissed three appeals filed by the revenue, emphasizing that procedural conditions should not defeat the purpose of beneficial legislation. The appeal involving duty-paying documents not in the claimant&#039;s name was remanded for further verification. The judgment underscores the importance of interpreting exemption notifications in a manner that advances their intended relief and purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>