<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 105 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78841</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the addition of unexplained share application money under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2004-2005 was dismissed. The Tribunal found that the share applicants were corporate entities who provided sufficient evidence to establish the genuineness of the transaction. The judgment emphasized the necessity of a reasoned order and proper investigation by the Assessing Officer. It aligned with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling that if there are doubts about the source of funds, action should be taken against the shareholders, not the company. The decision highlighted the importance of following legal procedures and providing evidence in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 105 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78841</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the addition of unexplained share application money under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2004-2005 was dismissed. The Tribunal found that the share applicants were corporate entities who provided sufficient evidence to establish the genuineness of the transaction. The judgment emphasized the necessity of a reasoned order and proper investigation by the Assessing Officer. It aligned with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling that if there are doubts about the source of funds, action should be taken against the shareholders, not the company. The decision highlighted the importance of following legal procedures and providing evidence in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>