<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 135 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78831</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the case for further examination of the relationship between the respondent and the service provider. The Court found no substantial legal question arising from this issue, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:26:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 135 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78831</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the case for further examination of the relationship between the respondent and the service provider. The Court found no substantial legal question arising from this issue, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>