<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 530 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78826</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s claim for a cash refund of Rs. 10 lakhs, as the refund had already been sanctioned, and the appellant could not immediately utilize it due to subsequent developments. Despite arguments and legal precedents cited, the Tribunal found no fault in the authorities&#039; decisions below and concluded that the appellant was not entitled to a cash refund based on the circumstances presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:02:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=116930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 530 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78826</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s claim for a cash refund of Rs. 10 lakhs, as the refund had already been sanctioned, and the appellant could not immediately utilize it due to subsequent developments. Despite arguments and legal precedents cited, the Tribunal found no fault in the authorities&#039; decisions below and concluded that the appellant was not entitled to a cash refund based on the circumstances presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=78826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>